Thayer v. Van Vleet
5 Johns. 111 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1809
The evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict; and the fact of the justice going to the jury and answering the question of law put to him, is not an irregularity for which the verdict ought to be set aside. There was in this case no semblance of abuse; and the consent of the parties may be inferred.
Judgment affirmed.
