History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thayer v. Van Vleet
5 Johns. 111
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1809
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict; and the fact of the justice going to the jury and answering the question of law put to him, is not an irregularity for which the verdict ought to be set aside. There was in this case no semblance of abuse; and the consent of the parties may be inferred.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Thayer v. Van Vleet
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1809
Citation: 5 Johns. 111
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.