History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thatcher's Requisition
18 Pa. Super. 533
Pa. Super. Ct.
1901
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

It is unnecessary at this time to express an opinion upon the question whether an appeal lies from the order referred to in the petition. It is sufficient for present purposes to say that even if an appeal does lie, our jurisdiction on appeal must necessarily be confined to an examination of the regularity and legality of the proceedings brought up by the certiorari and cannot be extended to an examination of the evidence adduced at the hearing or to the rulings of the judge upon questions of evidence. In saying this we are not to be understood as intimating that the rulings complained of were erroneous.

The motion for an order of supersedeas is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Thatcher's Requisition
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 16, 1901
Citation: 18 Pa. Super. 533
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.