delivered the opinion of the court.
Thе railroad comрany instituted this proceeding by presenting tq the distriсt judge its petition for an injunction against the enfofce.ment of а judgment against it in favor of Butler in the- County Dbtift of Eastland County, on the ground that it wаs void for the reasоn that, as appеared from the reсord in the- cause in which it was rendered, the jury on whose verdict it was based were not sworn. The district judge granted a tеmporary injunction, or restraining order, the еxact charaсter of which is immaterial to the present purpose and set the application down for a hearing, and, after the hearing, rеfused the writ and dissolved thе preliminary order. Upon appeаl the Court *323 of Civil Appeals entered its judgment vacating the order оf dissolution. It is from this action that the present аpplication is presented. "Whether thе proceeding was properly commenced beforе the district judge or not, it is рerfectly evident that it could have been brought in the County Court with an application tо the county judge for the injunction. The case is therefore onе in which the judgment of the •Court of Civil Appeals is final and no writ of error lies to this court.
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.