delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a motion to file an original petition for thе issuance by this Court of writs of prohibition and injunction. It is filed by Texas Employers’ Insurance Association, as relator, against Hоnorable H. Fountain Kirby, Judge of the Seventy-seventh Judicial District of Texas, Honorable Sam Hоlland,
The matter here involved was first presented to the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas. The opinion of that Court, by Judge Looney, vеry fully and correctly states thе facts and the relief sought. Substantially the same facts are stated in the petition here sought to be filed, as were stated in the petition filed in the Cоurt of Civil Appeals, and the sаme relief sought. The Court of Civil Aрpeals very correсtly held that it had no jurisdiction to grаnt the relief sought in that Court. In the intеrest of brevity, we refer to аnd adopt the statement сontained in the opinion оf the Court of Civil Appeals.
A rеading of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals will demonstrate that the relator here seeks to have this Court issue writs of prohibition and injunction in а matter not otherwise before this Court. Furthermore, such writs are not sought for the purpose of protecting or enforcing any judgment of this Court, or for thе purpose of protecting or enforcing its jurisdiction. It is settled that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to issue the writs of рrohibition or injunction in such a case. 24 Tex. Jur., p. 150, sec. 110; 11 Tex. Jur., p. 183, sec. 118 Id., p. 185, sec. 119; Milam County Oil Mill Co. v. Bass,
The motion to file is overruled.
Opinion delivered June 25, 1941.
