History
  • No items yet
midpage
Teramine v. Shuttleworth
151 F.2d 602
6th Cir.
1945
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel ;

And it appearing that the appellant is in confinement at the Federal Correctional Institution at Milan, Michigan, by virtue of a valid sentence of imprisonment in a penitentiary for the term of two years beginning on the date on which he was received at the penitentiary for service of such sentence;

And it appearing that this sentence, imposed May 25, 1942, was to run consecutively with a previous sentence imposed November 20, 1934:

And it appearing that the sentence under the prior conviction was not fully executed until November 9, 1944:

It is ordered that the order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and it hereby is, affirmed. Cf. Tippit v. Squier, 9 Cir., 145 F.2d 211.

Case Details

Case Name: Teramine v. Shuttleworth
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 17, 1945
Citation: 151 F.2d 602
Docket Number: No. 10033
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In