History
  • No items yet
midpage
Teplitzky v. Lippman
256 N.Y.S. 410
N.Y. App. Term.
1932
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Service of the summons by leaving it at the office of the Secretary of State in the city of New York, coupled with compliance by plaintiff with the other provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 57), sufficed to give the court jurisdiction of the defendants. (Stoibor v. Marinacci, 142 Misc. 345; affd., 235 App. Div. 714.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler andUntermyer, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Teplitzky v. Lippman
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Mar 25, 1932
Citation: 256 N.Y.S. 410
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.