36 Ga. App. 129 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1926
Tenney was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The jury had a right to believe that a short distance from Tenney’s house there were concealed a great number of fruit-jars which contained “moonshine” whisky; that, leading immediately from Tenney’s backdoor to the place where' the whisky was concealed, there was a well-beaten path which had just been used by one wearing rubber boots with distinguishing
The jury had ample evidence to convict the defendant, and for no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling his motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.