History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tenaglia v. Tenaglia
188 A. 370
Pa. Super. Ct.
1936
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

Upon a review of the evidence in this case we are in general accord with the conclusions of the Master and the Court below. Since the argument the appellant has died. We shall decide the case—see Upperman v. Upperman, 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 341—but no good purpose would be served by a review of the evidence.

The decree is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tenaglia v. Tenaglia
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 17, 1936
Citation: 188 A. 370
Docket Number: Appeal, 83
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.