History
  • No items yet
midpage
Teichmann v. Parrish
157 F.2d 75
D.C. Cir.
1946
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellee has recovered damages for alleged negligent treatment administered to her by or under the direction of appellant as a physician. The evidence was conflicting. The principal question is whether the evidence favorable to appellee, if believed, supports the verdict. We find that it does. Appellant’s other assignments of error are also without merit.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Teichmann v. Parrish
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 28, 1946
Citation: 157 F.2d 75
Docket Number: No. 9173
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.