36 Kan. 457 | Kan. | 1887
The opinion of the court was delivered by
On June 1,1878, a judgment was recovered in the district court of Shawnee county by the Citizens’ Bank against H. K. Tefft, E. Tefft and D. B. Burdick, for $1,595.95, together with the costs of the action. This judgment was never satisfied, nor was any execution ever issued upon the same. Ou May 28, 1884, a motion was filed by the Citizens’ Bank, asking that the judgment be revived. A notice was served the same day on H. K. Tefft, notifying him that the hearing of the motion to revive the judgment would be brought on for hearing before the court on the 28th day of June, or as soon thereafter as opportunity was given. On the 6th day of August, 1884, the court, over the objection of H. K. Tefft, made an order reviving the judgment. He brings the present proceeding to reverse that order, contending that it was 'beyond the power of the court to revive the judgment at that time without his consent. In § 433 of the code it is enacted that—
“An order to revive an action against the representatives or successor of a defendant shall not be made without the consent of such representatives or successor unless in one year from the time it could have been first made.”
And by §440 it is provided that- — -
“If a judgment become dormant, it may be revived in the same manner as is prescribed for reviving actions before judgment.”
The order of the district court will be reversed.