Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians ex. rel. U. S. v. Olson, 144 F.2d 347

Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians ex. rel. U. S. v. Olson

144 F.2d 347 | 9th Cir. | 1944

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

This action is brought by a member of the Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe on a complaint containing three causes of action wherein it is claimed that the tribe is the owner of certain rights of fishery, and it is further claimed that Congress and the Secretary of the Interior and other officials have infringed thereon by the Fishery Acts and Regulations. Injunction and other relief is sought. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint by the District Court of Alaska up*414on the ground that plaintiff had no legal capacity to sue. The court entered an order sustaining the demurrer but refused to order the dismissal of the action. Appeal was taken from the order entered. A motion has been made to dismiss the appeal.

In Alaska, by statute, there is a requirement'that judgment shall be given upon the sustaining of a demurrer unless the party is allowed to plead over Section 3698, Compiled Laws of Alaska, 1933. Where a demurrer is sustained and there is an opportunity to take further action, since the statutory judgment has not been entered, the order sustaining the demurrer has no finality. Since no judgment entered, no appeal will lie. A “final decision” has not yet been entered. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a). This ex- . act point is settled on an Alaskan appeal, by this court, Judge Garrecht speaking, in Cole v. Rustgard, 9 Cir., 68 F.2d 316, 5 Alaska Fed. 716. This court, Judge Mathews speaking, recently held likewise in Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865. Such is the general rule. See Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Second Edition 1943, Volume 10, § 4901, Note 66.

Appeal dismissed.