History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tecla Corp. v. Salon Tecla, Ltd.
163 N.E. 134
NY
1928
Check Treatment

The use by the defendant of the peculiar and characteristic script which the plaintiff had long employed for the display of its name is calculated to emphasize unduly the similarity of names and forcibly to suggest to the public identity of origin or management. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified to the extent that defendant is enjoined from writing or printing the word "Tecla" upon any signs, *Page 159 cards, stationery or advertising matter in the peculiar and characteristic script used by the plaintiff, and as modified affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff in the Appellate Division and in this court.

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ., concur; CRANE, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: Tecla Corp. v. Salon Tecla, Ltd.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 19, 1928
Citation: 163 N.E. 134
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.