History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tech Spray, LP v. Russell
2:07-cv-00211
D. Ariz.
Nov 21, 2007
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:07-cv-00211-PGR Document 47 Filed 11/21/07 Page 1 of 2 WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) Tech Spray, L.P., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, No. CV-07-0211-PHX-PGR ) vs. ) )

Grant Russell, et ux., ORDER ) ) Defendants. )

Having considered the plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Pretrial Deadlines to Allow for Completion of Discovery (doc. #44), the Court finds that the motion should be granted.

The Court need not resolve the parties’ rather unseemly finger pointing regarding who is to blame for any discovery delays because the bottom line is that granting the relief requested by the plaintiffs, which is to extend the non- expert discovery deadline from December 31, 2007 until March 31, 2008, which is the current deadline for completing expert discovery, will not delay the resolution of this action under the remaining deadlines set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order (doc. #36). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Pretrial Deadlines to Allow for Completion of Discovery (doc. #44) is granted and that all non-expert *2 Case 2:07-cv-00211-PGR Document 47 Filed 11/21/07 Page 2 of 2 discovery shall be completed no later than March 31, 2008. All other remaining deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order (doc. #36) shall be remain in full force and effect.

DATED this 21 st day of November, 2007. - 2 -

Case Details

Case Name: Tech Spray, LP v. Russell
Court Name: District Court, D. Arizona
Date Published: Nov 21, 2007
Docket Number: 2:07-cv-00211
Court Abbreviation: D. Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.