TD Bank, N.A. v. SpectorTD Bank, N.A. v. Spector
A defendant seeking to be relieved of his or her default in appearing or answering the complaint must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious defense to the action (see
In light of the appellants’ failure to establish a reasonable excuse for their default, it is unnecessary to determine whether they demonstrated the existence of potentially meritorious defenses to the action (see Diederich v Wetzel, 112 AD3d 883 [2013]; Arias v First Presbyt. Church in Jamaica, 100 AD3d at 941).
The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit.
Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.