| Ala. | Jun 15, 1875
The ancestor of the appellees died, and administration of his estate was granted in 1866. Any claim which they can prefer to property of their ancestor, as exempt from administration, must be founded on the laws existing at his death. Subsequent legislation will not enlarge or diminish their rights in this respect. Taylor, Administrator, v. Pettus, 52 Ala. 287" court="Ala." date_filed="1875-01-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/taylor-v-pettus-6509008?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6509008">52 Ala. 287.
The statute of force, at the ancestor’s death, subjected all the property of a decedent to the payment of his debts, except articles of personal property specially enumerated, and in the event of the insolvency of the estate, real property,, not exceeding in value five hundred dollars, to include the homestead. The exemption was to the widow and minor children. R. C. § 2060-1. The personal property was without claim from the appellees, or the widow, who was then living, sold by the administrator in chief, and the proceeds of sale mingled with the assets generally, and applied in the course of administration. Whatever may have been the jurisdiction 5f the court of probate, while the personal property so exempt remained in 'specie, in the possession of the administrator, to have ordered its allotment to the widow
The right and remedy of the appellees is against the administrator who converted the property, and not against the appellant, or the assets in his hands to be administered. The decree of the court of probate is reversed, and a decree here rendered dismissing the petition of appellees.