History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor v. Woodard
98-7688
4th Cir.
Mar 31, 1999
Check Treatment

*1 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Herbert Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Herbert Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Woodard, No. CA-98- 419-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. Woodard
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 31, 1999
Docket Number: 98-7688
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.