History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor v. Taylor
73 N.J. Eq. 745
N.J.
1908
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

Complainant filed a bill against her husband under the statute for a decree requiring him to pay alimony. He filed a cross-bill praying for divorce on the ground of desertion. By the final decree both bills were dismissed. Prom so much of the decree as dismisses the complainant’s bill she appeals. Defendant has not appealed.

We concur in the views expressed by Vice-Chancellor Learning so far as they relate to the dismissal of complainant’s bill, and the decree in that respect will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. Taylor
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 15, 1908
Citation: 73 N.J. Eq. 745
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.