Taylor v. State, 757 S.W.2d 959

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Thomas Kevin Taylor, seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction entered January 14, 1988. He filed a motion for a new trial January 22, 1988, which was denied April 8,1988. His notice of appeal was filed April 25, 1988. At the time, Ark. R. App. P. 4(c) provided for extension of the time for filing a notice of appeal by filing a new trial motion, but it was required that the motion for new trial be ruled on or taken under advisement within thirty days or it would be deemed denied. The time for filing a notice of appeal began to run at the end of thirty days from the time the new trial motion was filed.

On August 15,1988, an order was filed stating that the trial judge had taken the new trial motion under advisement January 31,1988. As that order was not a matter of record within thirty days of the filing of the motion for new trial, it was of no effect. Brittenum & Associates v. Mayall, 286 Ark. 427, 692 S.W.2d 248 (1985).

The clerk was correct in refusing to docket the case. We will permit the record to be filed if the attorney whose responsibility it was to file a timely notice of appeal accepts full responsibility for having failed to do so. Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986).

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. State

Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date Published: Oct 17, 1988

Citations: 757 S.W.2d 959; 296 Ark. 541; 1988 Ark. LEXIS 470; RC 88-54

Docket Number: RC 88-54

Court Abbreviation: Ark.