History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor v. State
213 Ga. App. 206
Ga. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Taylor appeals his convictions of child molestation, sexual battery, and aggravated sodomy. The sole enumeration of error •complains of the denial of defendant’s motion for new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Held:

The only argument attempted in defendant’s brief to this court consists of a reiteration of the alleged deficiencies of trial counsel. The brief raised at most issues as to the sufficiency of the evidence presented at the hearing on defendant’s motion for new trial. At that hearing, the State presented evidence in regard to each alleged deficiency of trial counsel which was sufficient to authorize the trial court to determine that defendant’s allegations concerning trial counsel’s representation of defendant were without merit and that defendant had been afforded effective assistance of counsel. York v. State, 207 Ga. App. 494, 495-497 (2) (428 SE2d 113).

Judgment affirmed.

Pope, C. J., and Smith, J., concur. *207Decided May 11, 1994. Stephen H. Harris, for appellant. Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, Gregory M. McConnell, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 11, 1994
Citation: 213 Ga. App. 206
Docket Number: A94A0414
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.