History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor v. State
2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1283
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
169 S.W.3d 897 (2005)

Chadrick TAYLOR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 85469.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

August 30, 2005.

Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Deborah Daniel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, C.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Chadrick Taylor, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the sentencing hearing.

The trial court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 30, 2005
Citation: 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1283
Docket Number: ED 85469
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.