32:T4c6,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., 127 N.J. Eq. 255","datePublished":"1940-04-25","legislationDate":"1940-04-25","citation":"Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., 127 N.J. Eq. 255 (N.J. 1940)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of New Jersey","description":"Read the full text of Taylor v. Phox Bus Co. (Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., 127 N.J. Eq. 255 (N.J. 1940)). This legal opinion, filed in 1940-04-25, from the Supreme Court of New Jersey discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/taylor-v-phox-bus-co--3562325"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/taylor-v-phox-bus-co--3562325","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., Supreme Court of New Jersey, Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., 127 N.J. Eq. 255 (N.J. 1940)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T446, Per Curiam.

The bill of complaint filed below alleges insolvency of defendant corporation within the statute, R. S. and prays for appropriate decree and the appointment of a receiver. The matter having been duly considered an order appointing receiver was entered in the Court of Chancery, from which this appeal is made.

The sole ground of appeal argued is that there was a failure of proof of the jurisdictional facts necessary to' the issuance of the order and, hence, the granting thereof constitutes an abuse of discretion in the court below.

We are satisfied that the proofs submitted support the order made and the same is affirmed.

For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 9.

For reversal — The Ciiiee-Justice, Dongbs, Heher, Porter, JJ. 4.