History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor v. Cooke
388 So. 2d 1082
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1980
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed with the sole exception of the provisions which declared the three named plaintiffs-appellees a legally cognizable class and accordingly assessed attorney’s fees against the defendant-appellant Taylor. None of the prerequisites for such a determination were present in this case. See, Frankel v. City of Miami Beach, 340 So.2d 463 (Fla.1976); Harrell v. Hess Oil and Chemical Corp., 287 So.2d 291, 293-94 (Fla.1973); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.220.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. Cooke
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 30, 1980
Citation: 388 So. 2d 1082
Docket Number: No. 79-2400
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.