History
  • No items yet
midpage
TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard
70 N.J. 93
| N.J. | 1976
|
Check Treatment
70 N.J. 93 (1976)
357 A.2d 765

FRANK H. TAYLOR AND SON, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SEYMOUR D. SHEPARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 27, 1976.
Decided May 13, 1976.

Mr. Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley and Geiser, attorneys).

Mr. Floyd F. Lombardi argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. DeSevo, Cerutti and Lombardi, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

*94 For affirmance — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judges CONFORD and CARTON — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: TAYLOR & SON, INC. v. Shepard
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 13, 1976
Citation: 70 N.J. 93
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.