History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tate v. State
5 Blackf. 174
Ind.
1839
Check Treatment
Dewey, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for winning “the sum of five dollars,” by a wager on an election. Plea, not guilty. Trial by the Court, and judgment of conviction. The evidence was that the plaintiff in error “ bet five dollars,” and that he and the person with whom he wagered made notes payable to each other for that amount, and placed them in the hands of a stake-holder. When the result of the wager was ascertained, which was in favour of the plaintiff in error, he and the other bettor received from the stake-holder both notes; one was destroyed, and the other delivered to the winner.

We think the Circuit Court erred in convicting the plaintiff in error upon this evidence. If the charge in the indictment, that the accused won “the sum of five dollars,” has any legal meaning át all, it is that he won five dollars in money. This charge is not established by the testimony. The parties to the bet staked each his promissory note to the other for five dollars. The notes were the things bet, and admitting the plaintiff in error won his adversary’s note, that does not sus*175tain the charge of winning money. The allegation and the proof are too variant to justify the finding of guilty.

C. B. Smith, for the plaintiff. W.-Quarles, for the state. Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the issue set aside. Cause remanded, &c.

Case Details

Case Name: Tate v. State
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 18, 1839
Citation: 5 Blackf. 174
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.