Tarver v. State
101 So. 926
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1924

The appellant was convicted for having in possession a still to be used for manufacturing prohibited liquors. No exceptions were reserved to the admission of evidence. The only question raised in the record is the refusal of the court to give charge 2. This charge is covered by given charge 1 and the oral charge of the court. There is no error in the record. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.