History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tartar v. Hall
3 Cal. 263
Cal.
1853
Check Treatment
Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

The mortgage executed by the defendant, operates an estoppel to the defence he has set up; according to well-established principles of public policy, for the security of good faith and fair dealing, a party is not allowed to controvert the declarations which he has made by deed, or to deny the enforcement of rights which he has thus attempted to confer.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tartar v. Hall
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1853
Citation: 3 Cal. 263
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.