midpage

Tartar v. HallTartar v. Hall

California Supreme Court
Oct 15, 1853
Reporters:
Before:
Heydenfeldt
Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, ‍‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‍Justice, concurred.

The mortgage executed by the defendant, operates an estoppel to the defence he ‍‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‍has set up; according to well-established principles of public policy, for the security of ‍‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‍good faith and fair dealing, a party is not allowed to controvert the declarations ‍‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‍which he has made by deed, or to deny the enforcement of rights which ‍‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‍he has thus attempted to confer.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tartar v. Hall
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1853
Citation: 3 Cal. 263
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
Log In