Taormina v. Poline
122 N.J. Eq. 221
| N.J. | 1937

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

*Page 222