MARIA DOLORES TANPINCO et al., Appellants, v ROYAL CARIBBEAN INTERNATIONAL et al., Defendants, CORPORATE TRAVEL SERVICES et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
November 30, 2010
[911 NYS2d 625]
Defendants demonstrated a reasonable excuse for their delay in answering the complaint, i.e., that their insurance carrier failed to forward the complaint to counsel (see Heskel‘s W. 38th St. Corp. v Gotham Constr. Co. LLC, 14 AD3d 306, 307 [2005]). The record shows no willful default on defendants’ part and no prejudice to plaintiffs as a result of the delay (see Pagan v Four Thirty Realty LLC, 50 AD3d 265 [2008]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.
