midpage

Tanner v. StackTanner v. Stack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 1, 2019
9982N 153234/18
Versions:176 A.D.3d 429
107 N.Y.S.3d 660
2019 NY Slip Op 07039
2019 NY Slip Op 7039

Lester J. Tanner, New York, appellant pro se.

Sherman Wells Sylvester & Stamelman LLP, New York (Joshua S. Bratspies of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff‘s motion for leave to file a proposed amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

By the time plaintiff moved for leave to amend, the original complaint had already been dismissed; hence, “there was no complaint left before the court to amend” (Jeffrey L. Rosenberg & Assoc. v Kadem Capital Mgt., 306 AD2d 155, 156 [1st Dept 2003]; see generally Wadsworth Ave. Assoc. v Maynard, 91 AD3d 452, 453 [1st Dept 2012]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 1, 2019

CLERK

Case Details

Case Name: Tanner v. Stack
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 1, 2019
Citations: 176 A.D.3d 429; 107 N.Y.S.3d 660; 2019 NY Slip Op 07039; 2019 NY Slip Op 7039; 9982N 153234/18
Docket Number: 9982N 153234/18
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In