History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall
60 N.Y.S. 474
N.Y. App. Term.
1899
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The record fails to show that the defendant is a resident within the jurisdiction of the municipal court, and it has been repeatedly held that all the facts necessary to give an inferior court jurisdiction must appear in the record (Frees v. Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 N. Y. 544, 19 N. E. 268), and that to all such courts the rule necessarily applies that their jurisdiction must *475appear, and no presumption can be invoked in their favor (Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151, 59 N. Y. Supp. 266, 319).

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Case Details

Case Name: Tannenbaum v. Natchtigall
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Oct 25, 1899
Citation: 60 N.Y.S. 474
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.