Tanksley v. StateTanksley v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Luke
Lead Opinion
The defendant was indicted upon two counts,— one charging forgery, and the other charging the uttering of a forged instrument. The defendant was convicted upon both counts. The evidence did not authorize the conviction under the count which charged the offense of forgery. There having been a conviction under both counts of the indictment, and the evidence not authorizing the conviction under one of the counts, it was error for the court to overrule his motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Bloodworth, J., concurs.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. In my opinion the evidence was sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction under both counts of the indictment.