Tancil v. Woolls, 379 U.S. 19

Per Curiam.

. The motion to ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‍affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‍both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‍that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases. Mr. ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‍Justice Brennan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‍be noted in No. 386.

Case Details

Case Name: Tancil v. Woolls

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Oct 26, 1964

Citations: 379 U.S. 19; 85 S. Ct. 157; 13 L. Ed. 2d 91; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 310; 386

Docket Number: 386

Court Abbreviation: U.S.