Tancil v. Woolls, 13 L. Ed. 2d 91

Per Curiam.

. The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases. Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

Case Details

Case Name: Tancil v. Woolls

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Oct 26, 1964

Citations: 13 L. Ed. 2d 91; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 310; 85 S. Ct. 157; 379 U.S. 19; 386

Docket Number: 386

Court Abbreviation: U.S.