Tancil v. Woolls
379 U.S. 19
SCOTUS
1964
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

. The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases. Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.