No. 94-1101 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Jul 12, 1994
The appeals referee disqualified the appellant from unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that, while he had twice given notice to a supervisor of his impending week-long absence from work, he had not done so to the proper superior as provided by the employer’s work rules. The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed. As a matter of law, however, these actions do not amount to “misconduct” under section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1993). Doyle v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 635 So. 2d 1028" date_filed="1994-04-22" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Doyle v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N">635 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); King v. Walgreen Co., 635 So. 2d 997" date_filed="1994-04-19" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="King v. Walgreen Co.">635 So.2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., 637 So. 2d 269" date_filed="1994-04-19" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc.">637 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Kelley v. Pueblo Wholesale Co., 627 So. 2d 534" date_filed="1993-11-09" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Kelley v. PUEBLO WHOLESALE CO. INC.">627 So.2d 534 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Nelson v. Burdines, Inc., 611 So. 2d 1329" date_filed="1993-01-12" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Nelson v. Burdines, Inc.">611 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Benitez v. Girlfriday, Inc., 609 So. 2d 665" date_filed="1992-11-24" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Benitez v. Girlfriday, Inc.">609 So.2d 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Adams v. Burdines, Inc., 600 So. 2d 1233" date_filed="1992-06-09" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Adams v. Burdines, Inc.">600 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Woskoff v. Desta Enters., 187 So. 2d 101" date_filed="1966-05-31" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Woskoff v. Desta Enterprises, Inc.">187 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Spaulding v. Florida Indus. Comm’n, 154 So. 2d 334" date_filed="1963-06-11" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Spaulding v. Florida Industrial Commission">154 So.2d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Accordingly, the order is reversed with directions to afford the appellant the benefits claimed.