167 Pa. 91 | Pa. | 1895
Opinion by
The question raised by the first, second, third and fourth assignments of error has just been decided in the Lehigh Coal and Navigation Company v. The Inter County-Street Railway Company, ante, p. 75. It is not necessary to repeat what is there said. We have no doubt that the consent obtained from Coll was invalid for the reason stated by the learned judge of the court below, and for the further reason stated in the Penna. Schuylkill Valley Railroad Company v. The Montgomery County Street Railway Company, ante, p. 62, also decided at the present term. It was the action of an individual upon a consideration moving to him as an individual, and not the action of an officer, appearing upon the records of the township where the evidence of official action should appear.
But this conclusion does not require us to reverse the decree.
The fact that neither company has a valid consent from the township to occupy the public roads under the papers now before us, is no reason why the injunction ordered in this case should not stand.
The decree is affirmed. The costs to be paid by the appellant.