History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.
127 Cal. App. 758
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

[1] Under the authority of section 3, Rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, respondent moves to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the ground that the appeal was *Page 759 taken for delay only and that the questions on which the decision of the case depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. After examining the transcript on appeal in connection with the points made in appellant's brief it is our opinion that the appeal presents a debatable question of law, and therefore the motion is denied.

Thompson (R.L.), J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 30, 1932
Citation: 127 Cal. App. 758
Docket Number: Docket No. 8792.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.