History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taff v. State
29 Ga. App. 223
Ga. Ct. App.
1922
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

Although the evidence raises a strong suspicion of guilt, it is not sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of the guilt of the defendant. It was, therefore, error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Len B. Ouillebeau, A. W. Powell, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Taff v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 16, 1922
Citation: 29 Ga. App. 223
Docket Number: 13790
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.