midpage

Tafero v. StateTafero v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 6, 1983
62847
Versions:440 So. 2d 350

On consideration of the Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, it is ordered by the Court that said motion be and the same is hereby denied.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and ADKINS, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents with an opinion.

OVERTON, J., dissents with an opinion, in which BOYD, J., concurs.

BOYD, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent and would grant leave to apply for a writ of error coram nobis. I believe that when a witness, under penalty of perjury, recants critical testimony given at the trial, there should be an evidentiary hearing. Such a recantation raises the question of whether an innocent person has been sentenced to prison or the electric chair on the basis of perjured testimony. Surely when a substantial question of such a miscarriage of justice has been raised, the state, society, and the courts should be sufficiently concerned to require further inquiry.

OVERTON, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent. I would find that whenever the asserted recanted testimony was a critical feature of the trial there must be an evidentiary hearing.

BOYD, J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Tafero v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Oct 6, 1983
Citations: 440 So. 2d 350; 62847
Docket Number: 62847
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In