midpage

T.D. Bank, N.A. v. Halcyon Jets, Inc.T.D. Bank, N.A. v. Halcyon Jets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 4, 2012
Versions:99 A.D.3d 431
951 N.Y.2d 724

The documentary evidence submitted on the motion—namely, checks from the Law Offices of Milton S. Rinzler to certain defendants—failed to show conclusively that plaintiff‘s claims were time-barred. The affidavits submitted by defendants were not “documentary evidence” within the meaning of CPLR 3211 (a) (1) (see e.g. Granada Condominium III Assn. v Palomino, 78 AD3d 996, 997 [2d Dept 2010]; Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 85-86 [2d Dept 2010]), and without the affidavits, it cannot be concluded that defendant 73rd Townhouse LLC made distributions that were protected by the statute of limitations in Limited Liability Company Law § 508 (c).

On appeal, defendants argue only the statute of limitations. Accordingly, they have abandoned so much of their motion as was based on CPLR 3211 (a) (7). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: T.D. Bank, N.A. v. Halcyon Jets, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 4, 2012
Citations: 99 A.D.3d 431; 951 N.Y.2d 724
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In