History
  • No items yet
midpage
Szathmary v. Adams
166 Mass. 145
Mass.
1896
Check Treatment
Knowlton, J.

It is a familiar rule of law, that, in the absence of an express agreement to the contrary, the owner of a tenement let to a tenant is not bound to make repairs upon it during the term, and that the tenant alone is liable to third persons for damages caused by suffering the premises to become dangerous for want of proper repairs. Kirby v. Boylston Market Association, 14 Gray, 249. Milford v. Holbrook, 9 Allen, 17, 21. Clifford v. Atlantic Cotton Mills, 146 Mass. 47.

The plaintiff was injured by the fall of a window blind from a part of 'the defendant’s building which had been let to a tenant. The judge found as a fact that at the time of the accident the blind was in the exclusive use and control of the tenant. There is nothing in the bill of exceptions to indicate that this finding was erroneous, nor to control the presumption of law that it was the duty of the tenant to keep the premises safe for persons passing or standing on-the sidewalk below.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Szathmary v. Adams
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: May 21, 1896
Citation: 166 Mass. 145
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.