Order entered October 9, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion to dismiss the third-party complaint granted. “ Where the defendant is alleged to be guilty only of active as distinguished from passive negligence, impleader is improper as a matter of law, since an actively negligent tort-feasor is not entitled to indemnity (see, e.g., Messaro v. Long Is. R. R. Co.,
Szarewicz v. Alboro Crane Rental Corp.
291 N.Y.S.2d 757
N.Y. App. Div.1968Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
