History
  • No items yet
midpage
Syrian-America Oil Corporation, S.A. (Hereinafter SAMOCO) v. Pecten Orient Company F/K/A Pecten Ash Sham F/K/A Pecten Syria Petroleum Company
01-15-00424-CV
Tex. App.
Nov 4, 2015
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/4/2015 3:39:29 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 01-15-00424-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/4/2015 3:39:29 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK NO. 01-15-00424-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT HOUSTON SYRIAN-AMERICAN OIL CORPORATION, S.A., Appellant, vs.

PECTEN ORIENT COMPANY f/k/a PECTEN ASH SHAM f/k/a PECTEN

SYRIA PETROLEUM COMPANY, Appellee. O N PPEAL FROM THE TH J UDICIAL D ISTRICT C OURT OF H ARRIS C OUNTY , T EXAS AUSE N . 2007-67830 AGREED MOTION TO ADOPT BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1, Appellant/Cross-

Appellee Syrian-American Oil Corporation, S.A. (SAMOCO) and Appellee/Cross-

Appellant Pecten Orient Company f/k/a Pecten Ash Sham f/k/a Pecten Syria

Petroleum Company (Pecten) request the Court to approve an agreed briefing

schedule in this civil appeal and cross-appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure do not provide a separate

briefing schedule for cases involving a cross-appeal. Rather, under Rule 38.6, each

party who files a notice of appeal must file an appellant’s brief. T EX . R. PP . P.

38.6. Each party who responds to the brief would then file a response brief as an

appellee. Id. And each appellant may then file a reply to the appellee’s response

brief. Id. This parallel briefing scheme results in a total of six briefs.

In an effort to reduce the number of briefs to be filed in this case, the

parties have agreed upon and propose the following briefing schedule and word

count limits, subject to the exclusions outlined in Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 9.4(i)(1):

a. SAMOCO’s appellant’s brief shall be due no later than 30 days

after the date the reporter’s record is filed with the Court and shall contain no more

than 15,000 words.

b. Pecten’s appellee/cross-appellant’s brief shall be due no later

than 30 days after the date SAMOCO’s appellant’s brief is filed and shall contain

no more than 22,000 words.

c. SAMOCO’s appellant’s reply/cross-appellee’s brief shall be

due no later than 30 days after the date Pecten’s appellee/cross-appellant’s brief is

filed and shall contain no more than 12,000 words.

d. Pecten’s cross-appellant’s reply brief shall be due 20 days after

the date SAMOCO’s reply/cross-appellee’s brief is filed and shall contain no more

than 5,000 words.

The proposed word count limits comply with Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 9.4(i)(2)(B)’s mandate that in civil appeals, “the aggregate of all briefs

filed by a party must not exceed 27,000 words if computer-generated.” The

proposed timing of the various briefs is also consistent with Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.6 governing the time to file appellant’s, appellee’s, and

reply briefs, subject to possible extensions upon further motion by a party.

The parties ask the Court to adopt this agreed briefing schedule and

word count limits for purposes of efficiency and to reduce the number of briefs that

the Court must review in this case. The parties have agreed to this schedule in

advance of the filing of a complete reporter’s record in this case and thus before

the time to file appellants’ briefs has begun to run. By this agreed motion, the

parties do not intend to waive the right to file motions for extension of time under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d), under appropriate circumstances.

For all of these reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Court

grant this motion and adopt the agreed briefing schedule set forth above.

Respectfully submitted, BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. By: /s/ Macey Reasoner Stokes Macey Reasoner Stokes State Bar No. 00788253 One Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 713.229.1369 713.229.7869 (Facsimile) macey.stokes@bakerbotts.com Lauren Tanner Bradley State Bar No. 24066177 Ashley Carr State Bar No. 24082619 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1500 Austin, Texas 78701 512.322.2500 512.322.2501 (Facsimile) lauren.bradley@bakerbotts.com ashley.carr@bakerbotts.com A TTORNEYS FOR A PPELLEE /C ROSS - PPELLANT P ECTEN RIENT C OMPANY F / K / A P ECTEN SH S HAM F / K / A P ECTEN YRIA P ETROLEUM OMPANY *5 SHIPLEY SNELL MONTGOMERY LLP By: /s/ Amy Douthitt Maddux Amy Douthitt Maddux Texas Bar No. 00796483 712 Main Street, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77002-3201 (713) 490-3827 (713) 652-3057 (fax) amaddux@shipleysnell.com TTORNEYS FOR A PPELLANT /C ROSS - PPELLEE YRIAN -A MERICAN IL ORPORATION , S.A. *6 ERTIFICATE OF ERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of this Agreed Motion to Adopt

Briefing Schedule was served on all counsel of record as indicated below on the

4th day of November, 2015.

Counsel for Appellant Syrian-American Oil Corporation, S.A. :

John W. Stevenson Jr.

William Robert Hand

Stevenson & Murray

24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 750

Houston, Texas 77046

( by electronic mail )

Amy Maddux

Shipley Snell Montgomery LLP

712 Main Street, Suite 1400

Houston, Texas 77002-3201

( by electronic mail )

Robert Godlewski

Law Offices of Robert S. Godlewski

3950 Braxton Drive, Suite 100

Houston, Texas 77063

( by electronic mail )

D. Craig Olivier

Olivier & Mundy, L.L.P.

1414 West Clay

Houston, Texas 77019

( by electronic mail )

/s/ Macey Reasoner Stokes Macey Reasoner Stokes

Case Details

Case Name: Syrian-America Oil Corporation, S.A. (Hereinafter SAMOCO) v. Pecten Orient Company F/K/A Pecten Ash Sham F/K/A Pecten Syria Petroleum Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 4, 2015
Citation: 01-15-00424-CV
Docket Number: 01-15-00424-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In