History
  • No items yet
midpage
Swope v. Leffingwell
105 U.S. 3
SCOTUS
1881
Check Treatment
Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the, opinion of the court.

We have jurisdiction of this case. The motion to dismiss , is, therefore, denied; but as the only Federal question presented on the merits was decided by the court below in accordance with our rulings in National Bank v. Matthews (98 U. S. 621) and National Bank v. Whitney (108 id. 99), the motion to affirm is

Granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Swope v. Leffingwell
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 15, 1881
Citation: 105 U.S. 3
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.