Swift v. New York Medical CollegeSwift v. New York Medical College
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant‘s motion, in effect, pursuant to
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, service of an amended complaint containing no new causes of action, but merely restating and renumbering 5 of the plaintiff‘s original 12 causes of action, did not provide the defendant with a basis for circumventing the single motion rule (see B.S.L. One Owners Corp. v Key Intl. Mfg., 225 AD2d 643 [1996];
The parties’ remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Spolzino, J.P., Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.