History
  • No items yet
midpage
Swift v. Hopkins
13 Johns. 313
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1816
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Unless the contractor shows distinctly that, in making the contract, he expressly, or ostensibly, acted as a public agent, it must be deemed a private contract* The return does not show that Swift assumed to act- in ,an official capacity when he made this contract: and the reason assigned by him for refusing to pay, was, that he could not make a charge of it against the government, is decisive to show that it was a private contract.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Swift v. Hopkins
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1816
Citation: 13 Johns. 313
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.