50 Ark. 300 | Ark. | 1887
OPINION.
It was the duty of the sheriff, therefore, to take the mule in question from the plaintiff, notwithstanding he had paid the defendant in replevin full value for the animal. Hoffman v. Conner, 76 N. Y., 121; Freeman on Ex., sec. 475.
The appellee was not guilty of conversion in taking the animal under the writ issued in pursuance off the judgment for the delivery to the plaintiff in replevin, and the judgment is right.
Affirm.