Swann v. State
23 Ga. App. 131 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1918
1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, being expressly disapproved by the trial judge, can not be considered.
2. The charge of the court upon the doctrine of reasonable doubt was sufficiently full. '
3. None of the other instructions excepted to, when viewed in the light of the charge as a whole, contains material error.
4. The alleged newly discovered evidence was cumulative and was not of such a character as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial.
5. Under the facts of the case the other special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit.
6. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.