midpage

Swain v. StateSwain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 14, 1991
89-2145
Versions:579 So. 2d 842
1991 WL 88809

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

On appellant‘s motion for rehearing, we withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following:

The order denying appellant‘s motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed because (a) it is time-barred under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and (b) its substance was raised in an earlier motion which was denied. Assuming the points were properly considered at this time, appellant‘s jury separation issue is without merit where, as here, there was no objection to the separation and an admonition was given to the jury. See Pope v. State, 569 So.2d 1241, 1244 (Fla. 1990); Busquet v. State, 498 So.2d 1353, 1356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Ulloa v. State, 486 So.2d 1373, 1376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Swain v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 14, 1991
Citations: 579 So. 2d 842; 1991 WL 88809; 89-2145
Docket Number: 89-2145
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In