Case Information
*1
14 THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTEENTH JUOICIAL DISTRICT HOUSTON, TEXAS
APPELLANT PRO SE:O RESPONSE TO "NOTICE BY THE CLERK, CONSISTOPHER A. PRINES, OF A PRO SE RESPONSE BY THIS HON. COURT TO AN ALLEREN ANDERS BRIEF" (?)
*2 APPELLAUT PRO SE'S RESPONSE TO "NOTICE AV THE CLERK, CHRISTOPHER A. PRIDE, OF FILED A PRO SE RESPONSE AV THIS HON. COURT TO AN ALLEGED ANDERS SRIEF.".(?) AND TO THE HON. JUDGES OF SAID COURT OF APPEALS; COME'S NOT, SUEM ERIK JOHANSSON, APPELLANT PRO SE HEREIN, AND
this hie response to the titled cause, as fallous; 81. Appellant pro-so has not received any copy of "EITHER" of the based documents or litigation(s) stated in the Hon. Clarks "CARO NOTICE" about AN ALLEGED ANDERS SRIEF BEING FILED, HOR, AN ALLEGED PRO SE RESPONSE TO ONE AV THIS HON. COURT OF APPEALS....(?) SESPONSE TO ONE AV THIS HON. COURT OF APPEALS....(?)
- Appellant pro-so HAS no COUSEL... (PRO SE).... SO, it is highly unlikely that appollant pro-so has filed any anders briaf IG HIS SUN APPEAL....(?) AS. HOWEVER, [I]F the Appelless have filed such a briaf, wo do thank then for their professional ethics of HONESTY, and ask that this Hon. Court of Appoals ORDER A SEVERGAL IN THE DEFAULT JUDENENT ORDER OF THE HON. CARIG HENON, 1st Judicial dist. Ct, Jasper Co.,Tx., Cass no. 4534, and, ORDER SAID TITLE AND DEED OF THE MAIED HONESTEAD REPLACED BACK INTO THE LOCAL OUNERSHIP OF APPELLANT PRO SE HEREIN, and, should the Appelless desire to continue this suit, follow due process of law and issue service of notice of intent to sue and levy for their money/taxes, giving the Appellant pro so a fair opportunity to retain a loan on said property and pay the back taxes while Appellant pro-so is incarcerated, or file bankrupsy....(?) The later is NOT Appellant pro-so's choice, but, if forced to do so, WILL do so in order to save his Honestead...(?) Altornatively, allow Appellant tias to regain his liberty and 90-daya thereafter, those taxes will be paid....(?) NOTE TO THE CLERK: Please be more specific as to HHON filon an ANDERS SRIEF..?..IN UHD'S SCHALF..?..As Appellant pro-so IS A PRO SE APPLLANT. NO SUGH SRIEF WAS FILED [B]V APPELLANT PRO SE..., AND APPELLANT PRO SE HAS NOT SEEN NOTIFICO OF ANY SUGH COUNGELD "APPEINTHENT"...(?) ANY ANDERS SRIEF FILED IN THIS CASE DENGUEDING APPELLANT PRO SE'S CLARK(S) & APPEAL IS UHOLLY WITHOUT MERIT.
*3
50 PRAVES, THIS Snd DAV OF JULY. 2015.
Reagentfully submitted,
SUEH ERIK JOHANSSON, APPELLANT PRO SE TOOJA 1465256/C.T.Torrell/RS unit 1380 F.M. 655
Rashoran, Tx. 77583
CERTIFIGATE OF SERVICE
I. SUEH ERIK JOHANSSON, APPELLANT PRO SE HEREIN, do state under penalty of pjexjury that I have sent all parties in this case a copy of this 3-pg RESPONSE TO THE 14th COURT OF APPEALS (TEXAS-HOURTEN) CLERKS NOTICE OF A PRO SE FILING OF RESPONSE TO AN ALLEGED ANDERS SRIEF (?) original and one copy to 14th Ct. of Anps. One copy to Appallas counsel, LINEBARGER COOGAH CLAIR & SAMPSON LLP, one copy to 1st Jud. Diast. Ct., Clark, Kothy Kent, Jasper Co, Tx.....deposited in Indigent mail drop box on C.T. Torrell/RS unit on this 2nd day of July 2015.
SUEH ERIK JOHANSSON, APPELLANT PRO SE