Sutton v. Township of Maurice River
93 N.J.L. 504 | N.J. | 1919
The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Kalisch, White, Heppeni-ieimer; Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Black, J. 1.
