Sutton v. Township of Maurice River

93 N.J. Eq. 484 | N.J. | 1922

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by AGce-Chancellor Learning

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mintdrn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacit, AYjlltams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.